MO
MURPHY OIL CORP (MUR)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025: Adjusted EPS $0.56, GAAP EPS $0.50; adjusted EPS beat Street ($0.49) while revenue of $665.7M modestly missed ($668.9M); adjusted EBITDA $338.6M beat ($340.4M est) largely on production mix and cost control despite weather/downtime headwinds . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Production averaged 157 MBOEPD (78.5 MBOPD), down from 175 in Q4 and 185 in Q3, driven by non‑operated downtime (Gulf of America), offshore Canada logistics, and delayed well timing from winter storms .
- Guidance maintained: FY 2025 CAPEX $1.135–$1.285B and production 174.5–182.5 MBOEPD; management now expects full‑year volumes toward the low end due to Q1 impacts; Q2 production guided up to 177–185 MBOEPD as new onshore/Gulf wells come online .
- Capital allocation credible: repurchased $100M (3.6M shares) in Q1; liquidity ~$1.5B; FPSO acquisition (BW Pioneer) reduces annual operating costs by ~$50–$60M with a ~2‑year payback, aiding cash flow and offshore returns .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Vietnam exploration success: Lac Da Hong-1X (Pink Camel) discovery encountered 106 feet net oil pay; flow tested ~2,500 BOPD of 38° API oil; management: “This discovery enhances the value of Murphy's growing Vietnam business” .
- FPSO acquisition: BW Pioneer purchase drives direct operating cost reduction (~$50–$60M/yr) and 2‑year payback; CFO: “reduces our annual net operating expenses by approximately $50 million” .
- Capital returns and discipline: $100M buybacks in Q1; ongoing commitment to allocate ≥50% of adjusted FCF to shareholders while maintaining ~$1.0B long‑term debt goal .
-
What Went Wrong
- Production headwinds: 6 MBOEPD impacts in Q1 from non‑operated downtime (Gulf of America), offshore Canada curtailments, and winter storms delaying Mormont #4 and Samurai #3 timing .
- Cost profile elevated near term: LOE per BOE excluding NCI rose to $13.74/BOE in Q1; management expects normalization to ~$10–$12/BOE in 2H 2025 post workovers .
- Q4 comparison weak: prior quarter (Q4 2024) missed Street on EPS and revenue amid downtime and a less successful Eagle Ford completion design, heightening scrutiny of execution consistency . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Financial Results
Actual vs Consensus (S&P Global)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment/Geographic Revenue
Key KPIs and Balance Sheet
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO on Vietnam success: “This discovery enhances the value of Murphy's growing Vietnam business... coupled with our nearby Lac Da Vang development and our recent Hai Su Vang discovery.”
- CFO on FPSO value: “This transaction creates tremendous value... reduces our annual net operating expenses by approximately $50 million, thereby achieving a 2‑year payback.”
- CEO on capital plan flexibility at lower oil prices: identified cuts to Eagle Ford, Kaybob, Montney and GOM development if <$55/bbl; commitment to LDV and high‑impact exploration despite volatility .
Q&A Highlights
- Capital flexibility: If sustained <$55/bbl, MUR would trim late‑year onshore/GOM activity with limited impact to 2025 volumes but more to 2026; LDV and Vietnam/Côte d’Ivoire exploration likely proceed given long‑term value .
- Gulf workovers: Khaleesi‑2 safety valve fix targeted Q2; Marmalard‑3 sidetrack targeted Q3; LOE trend to ~$10–$12/BOE in 2H 2025 .
- Cost outlook: Onshore well costs effectively flat vs 2024; OCTG exposure modest; offshore rigs/diesel down; most equipment in‑country, limited tariff sensitivity .
- Canada Montney optionality: Plant at ~500 MMCFD; short‑cycle wells could keep capacity higher if AECO/LNG signals prove durable; strong well economics ($5–$5.5M/well; IPs 17–25 MMCFD) .
- Buybacks: Will be opportunistic but balanced to protect “industry‑leading balance sheet” amid lower FCF at low oil prices .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025: Adjusted EPS $0.56 vs $0.49 consensus (beat); revenue $665.7M vs $668.9M consensus (slight miss); EBITDA $349.8M vs $340.4M consensus (beat). Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Prior quarters: Q4 2024 missed on EPS and revenue vs consensus; Q3 2024 beat both EPS and revenue. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Near‑term estimate revisions should reflect:
- Higher Q2 volume trajectory (177–185 MBOEPD) as onshore wells and Samurai/Mormont contribute .
- Lower full‑year production skew (toward low end) from Q1 impacts and workover timing .
- Structural offshore OpEx reduction from FPSO acquisition supporting margin resilience .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near‑term production snapback: Q2 guide 177–185 MBOEPD and resumed Gulf wells set up sequential improvement after Q1 downtime; watch LOE normalization in H2 .
- Cost tailwinds offshore: FPSO ownership lowers OpEx by ~$50–$60M annually, enhancing project IRRs and cash generation through the cycle .
- Exploration as catalyst: LDH discovery adds to HSV momentum; LDV development on track for 4Q26 first oil; Côte d’Ivoire program in 4Q25 offers high‑impact optionality .
- Capital returns remain credible: $100M buybacks in Q1 and dividend raised to $0.325; policy of ≥50% adjusted FCF to shareholders intact while preserving balance sheet strength .
- Guidance intact but conservative: FY production maintained with lower‑end bias; expect Street to modestly trim FY volumes while raising Q2/Q3 run‑rates .
- Risk management: Onshore well costs stable, limited tariff exposure, diversified gas marketing; optional trims identified for lower oil environments to protect FCF/dividend .
- Trade setup: Favor catalysts from Q2 production step‑up and LDV/HSV updates; stock could re‑rate on demonstrated LOE normalization and sustained execution in Gulf/Vietnam .
Notes:
- All consensus figures marked with * are Values retrieved from S&P Global.